On the separate issue, it may be fine to document misspellings and take-offs of the word, such as P0rn and Pron, but these are aberrations that don't belong in the initial definition. On your partial revert: The reason I removed is that, given the assertion that the word is based on "a writer who chronicled the lives of prostitutes", the name of the original writer is not relevant to the history of the word. Does anyone have any insight or sources about the legality of yiff or porn in general? Not-my-username 20:19, 6 October 2013 (EDT)Īn "excuse plot" is more than enough to pass the Miller Test, that's why they're there. govt, occupying a space of legal ambiguity that is generally not enforced either way. Most pornography you see on the Internet (fur or skin) does not pass and is considered obscene by the U.S. more than just an "excuse plot") to pass. A work of pornorgraphy would have to be (1) very well-drawn or (2) very well-written (i.e. I deleted this sentences from the Legality section: "In the United States the Miller Test would classify yiff as having "artistic value" therefore making it a legal form of pornography." because it misinterprets the Miller test. Just musing (eh, it works) - Spirou 03:08, (EDT) Wouldn't Furotica (furry term) supersede Pornography (mainstream term) in article standing?. Not really the place to be asking this, but if you go to e621 and search "female," that should work ~~ Where can I get decent porn as a heterosexual male? - 93.223.27.40 12:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Artists do not give up their copyright unless they explicitly state so.
#Gay furry porn forced free
But no, pics off an image board aren't free to use. I'm not attached to any particular picture being used on this art. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.96.46.121 ( talk I agree, hyper pandess isn't all that hot and a too specific fetish for a general description of porn.
![gay furry porn forced gay furry porn forced](https://66.media.tumblr.com/48a4810a0aec2d0bc970ef34776de73a/tumblr_mynesnIlyK1t8f222o1_1280.jpg)
The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.191.158.15 ( talk
#Gay furry porn forced license
Without trying to be too overly blunt, this picture is crap, and is a horrible reference for the entire scope of furry pornography, I suggest getting a random pic off of Fchan, or a random one off of the /c/ board and using it instead (because they are not protected under a specific license on that site) I think it would benefit the page as a whole. And put your comments for this on the feature nomination, as linked in the header. :-) - GreenReaper ( talk) 04:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC) So find them, improve them, nominate them. Surely we have better articles to feature? - IanKeith 22:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC) It's also definitely not something I want splattered on the front page. I just can't bring myself to agree with this. Re: Possible nomination for Featured Page 1 Re: Possible nomination for Featured Page.